Home Blog Page 14

Honda and Nissan Advance Merger Talks; Neither Can Find the EV Folder

Cody Thompson
-
0
Honda and Nissan Advance Merger Talks; Neither Can Find the EV Folder

TOKYO — Honda and Nissan executives spent Tuesday in a Marunouchi conference room advancing what bankers are calling ‘exploratory discussions,’ ‘preliminary frameworks,’ and, in one leaked Slack message reviewed by this reporter, ‘Mom and Dad finally talking about it.’

The two carmakers, both of which have approached the EV transition the way a freshman approaches a 200-page reading list, are reportedly pursuing a tie-up that would create the world’s third-largest auto group on paper and the world’s most administratively confused one in practice.

A Nissan engineer who took a cigarette break outside the Yokohama headquarters said the merger was the first he’d heard of any merger, and asked whether it meant the cafeteria would finally switch vendors.

Internal slides circulated to investors estimate $3 billion in annual ‘synergies,’ a category bankers have historically used to mean ‘we will fire some people in Tennessee.’ The deck also lists ‘shared EV platform’ as a 2031 deliverable, a date by which BYD will have launched fourteen new models, two pickup trucks, and possibly a moon lander.

Toyota, asked for comment, said it was ‘watching with interest,’ which in Toyota-speak ranks somewhere between ‘deeply concerned’ and ‘already won.’

Honda is reportedly bringing the Civic, brand recognition, and roughly 4,300 unsold Prologue EVs sitting on dealer lots in Riverside County. Nissan is bringing the Leaf, factories, and a 13% stake in itself that Renault has not yet decided whether to sell. The combined entity would, by one analyst’s math, own pieces of itself in three countries and owe pieces of itself to two more.

‘It’s the kind of deal where the synergy math works only if you don’t include the integration costs, the legal costs, the cultural costs, or any of the actual cars,’ said Marcus Hellman of Beacon Strategy, eating a tuna onigiri at his desk between calls. ‘Other than that it’s transformative.’

One Honda board member, reached briefly by phone, said he was supportive in principle but had been told the new logo would be presented next quarter, and was waiting to see it before committing further. He was then handed off to a younger staffer who clarified that ‘next quarter’ had been understood internally as ‘sometime.’

A signing ceremony is tentatively scheduled for the first quarter of 2026, pending due diligence, regulatory approval in four jurisdictions, and someone at either company being able to confirm what, exactly, the new company will be called.

On PBS, NPR, and the Civic Cowardice of Pretending This Is Sudden

Margaret Thorne
-
0
On PBS, NPR, and the Civic Cowardice of Pretending This Is Sudden

What does it mean that the draft memo to halt federal funding for PBS and NPR leaked on a Friday afternoon, and the only person I know who seemed surprised was the woman pouring my wine?

I was in Cleveland Park last weekend at a dinner I did not particularly want to attend. Eliza had assembled what she calls her “thinking table” — a former undersecretary, two journalists who no longer file, a bipartisan lobbyist whose practice I will describe only as “adjacent to broadband,” and my sister-in-law Judy, who has worked at the National Archives long enough to know which silences mean what. The draft had been public for ninety minutes. Nobody mentioned it until the second course.

When somebody finally did, it was the lobbyist, and he raised it the way one raises a parking ticket. He said the funding question had been “on the table for years” and that “the institutional case was always weaker than the brand case.” He said “brand case.” About Frontline. About All Things Considered. About the only newsroom in three counties of West Virginia my sister-in-law’s husband can still get on the radio in his truck.

Eliza nodded the way she nods when she has decided not to argue. The undersecretary said the public-media model was, and I am quoting, “a Cold War artifact.” One of the no-longer-filing journalists said something about audience capture. Judy looked at her plate.

I said: a country that builds something for sixty years and then dismantles it on a Friday afternoon, with a draft memo, with no hearing, with the lobbyist for the people who would inherit the spectrum sitting at this very table — that country is telling on itself. I said it lightly. I am told I always say it lightly.

“Margaret, please,” Eliza said, in the voice she uses for both political opinions and undercooked fish.

Here is what I keep coming back to. The plan is not radical. The plan is a paragraph. It will be defended in op-eds by people who once sat on the boards of these stations, who once thanked them in book acknowledgments, who once accepted their awards in rented tuxedos. The defense will be that public broadcasting has “lost its way.” The defense will be that the market has matured. The defense will be that nobody under forty listens to the radio anyway, which is the kind of sentence one says about a thing one is preparing to throw out.

I am not making the case that Sesame Street is the last thread of the republic. I am making the case that we keep getting these memos on Fridays, and we keep absorbing them by Monday, and the lobbyist keeps explaining the brand case over the cheese, and the undersecretary keeps calling things artifacts, and the table keeps agreeing because disagreement has become a kind of bad manners. There is a word for a polity that has decided manners are more important than memory. The word is not flattering and I will let you find it.

Judy walked me to my car. She has the carriage of a woman who spends her professional life cataloguing what other people decide to throw away. She said, very quietly, that the Archives had received an unusual number of calls this week from station managers asking what their broadcast tapes from the seventies were technically owed. She said it the way you say a thing you are not sure you should be saying. Then she hugged me and went back inside, where the lobbyist was, I am told, examining his cufflink.

The memo will move. It will be softened, then hardened, then softened again, and somewhere in March a version of it will pass on a procedural vote nobody covers because Congress will be doing six other things that day. And at some dinner in some house in some neighborhood that calls itself thoughtful, a man in a good jacket will call it overdue. And the rest of the table will pass the bread.

Year-End Spending Package Now 2,400 Pages, 11 of Them About Spending

Nash Grayson
-
0
Year-End Spending Package Now 2,400 Pages, 11 of Them About Spending

WASHINGTON, DC — Congressional negotiators racing to finalize a year-end spending package before Friday’s deadline confirmed Sunday that the 2,400-page omnibus is on track for passage, pending the resolution of approximately eleven pages dealing with federal expenditures and the other 2,389 pages, which lawmakers described as “the important stuff.”

The bill, which must pass before the holiday recess so members can return home and complain about Washington, currently includes funding for the Pentagon, the IRS, and a federally protected scenic byway in Western Pennsylvania that runs exclusively past three properties owned by the same gentleman.

“We’re very close,” said a senior Senate aide who has not made eye contact with sunlight since Tuesday. “We’ve resolved the FAA reauthorization, the dairy subsidy framework, and a provision renaming a post office after a man who is, frankly, still alive and still under indictment. The remaining sticking points are mostly the part where the government gets money.”

Among the surviving riders: a $14 million earmark for a maritime museum in a landlocked district, language exempting a single named hedge fund from a regulation it had not yet been subjected to, and a four-page section, inserted at 3:40 a.m. Saturday, that simply reads as a list of zip codes with no accompanying explanation. Staff have been instructed not to ask.

Negotiators have reportedly agreed to drop a bipartisan provision lowering insulin costs in exchange for keeping a provision that allows a defense contractor in Huntsville to bill the government for office snacks. Both sides described the trade as “a win for the American people,” though neither specified which Americans, or which people.

Rep. Brent Cauley (R-OH), asked whether he had read the bill, said he had read “the parts that mattered,” which he later clarified meant the table of contents and a single paragraph his chief of staff had highlighted in yellow. Sen. Marisol Pekar (D-NM) said she planned to vote yes “with reservations,” then declined to specify the reservations, then declined to specify which bill.

Leadership has committed to releasing the final text no fewer than four hours before the vote, allowing each member of Congress roughly 600 pages per hour of reading time, or, more realistically, time to draft a press release describing the bill they have not read as either a generational betrayal or a hard-won bipartisan victory, depending on the letter after their name.

The package is expected to pass by a comfortable margin Friday evening, after which lawmakers will fly home, denounce the dysfunction in Washington, and pledge to return in January determined to do this exact thing again next December.

SpaceX Starship Hits Every Mission Objective On List Updated Mid-Flight

Lena Wexler
-
0
SpaceX Starship Hits Every Mission Objective On List Updated Mid-Flight

STARBASE, TX — Engineers at SpaceX’s Starbase facility confirmed Saturday that the company’s latest Starship test flight had achieved one hundred percent of its mission objectives, a goals list which a spokesperson acknowledged was last revised at T+plus four minutes, twelve seconds.

The flight, which launched from the Gulf Coast facility shortly after dawn, completed what the company described as a ‘fully nominal trajectory’ until the moment the trajectory ceased being nominal, at which point the criteria for a nominal trajectory were updated to include whatever Starship was currently doing.

‘This is the most data-rich test we’ve ever flown,’ said Aaron Vesely, a propulsion lead at SpaceX, gesturing at a monitor that had gone dark. ‘Every single thing the vehicle did, including the parts where it stopped doing things, gave us tremendously valuable information about what the vehicle does.’

According to telemetry briefly available to the public livestream, the upper stage achieved orbital velocity, deployed a payload simulator, and then underwent what the company is now calling a ‘controlled energetic reentry,’ a phrase introduced to the press kit between 7:14 and 7:16 a.m. Central. The lower booster, originally slated to return to the launch tower, instead returned to the Gulf of Mexico, which engineers described as ‘an alternative recovery surface available year-round.’

The launch was the eleventh full-stack test of the program and, per a SpaceX press release, the eleventh consecutive complete success. A Beacon Strategy aerospace analyst noted that the company’s definition of success has now been revised so many times that the original 2019 mission criteria — ‘reach orbit, deploy satellites, return both stages intact’ — are no longer referenced in any current documentation, having been replaced by the broader objective of ‘fly.’

Federal Aviation Administration observers, who were present to monitor debris fields, reported that the debris field ‘fell within the expanded debris field,’ a designation the agency expanded in October to accommodate previous debris fields. Residents of South Padre Island reported a sonic event consistent with a vehicle that was, at one point, a vehicle.

Elon Musk, posting from his account during reentry, described the flight as ‘a huge step toward Mars,’ a step the company has been taking, by its own count, eleven times. He added that Starship would be carrying humans to the lunar surface ‘soon,’ using the same definition of soon that has applied since 2022.

NASA, which has tied roughly four billion dollars in Artemis program funding to a working version of the vehicle, issued a statement congratulating SpaceX on ‘continued progress’ and declined to specify toward what. A program manager, speaking on condition of not being named in any document a contractor might later cite, said the agency was ‘cautiously optimistic that the next flight will incorporate lessons from this flight, the previous flight, and the flight before that, which incorporated lessons from the flight before that.’

Asked whether the booster’s unplanned ocean landing represented a setback, Vesely shook his head. ‘Setback implies a goal we didn’t meet,’ he said. ‘We met the goal. The goal was updated to reflect the meeting of the goal. That’s how iteration works.’

The next Starship test is tentatively scheduled for January, pending FAA review and the drafting of a fresh mission objectives document, which a SpaceX engineer confirmed would be finalized ‘sometime during ascent.’

Weather App Still Showing ‘Partly Cloudy’ Over Buried Des Moines

Lena Wexler
-
0
Weather App Still Showing ‘Partly Cloudy’ Over Buried Des Moines

DES MOINES, IA — As 14 inches of snow buried central Iowa Friday morning and shuttered three interstates, the AccuStorm weather app on Brian Hessler’s iPhone continued to display “Partly Cloudy, 38°F” alongside a chipper sun icon and the suggestion that it was “a great day for a run.”

Hessler, who could not locate his Subaru, said he kept refreshing.

The storm system, which the National Weather Service had been tracking since Tuesday, slammed across Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana overnight, leaving roughly 12,000 travelers stranded at airports and an undetermined number of Midwesterners genuinely curious why their phones did not appear to know they were inside a blizzard.

“Our model is performing as expected,” said Cale Voorhees, a senior meteorologist at hyperlocal forecasting platform ClearSky+, who declined to specify which expectation. Voorhees added that the app’s proprietary AI, trained primarily on five years of Pacific Northwest data, had recently been “rolled out to the rest of the country with minor regional adjustments” ahead of an investor demo.

By 9 a.m. local time, Uber was quoting six-minute ETAs on vehicles visibly entombed in snowbanks, three Lyft drivers in the Quad Cities had been deactivated for poor punctuality, and a Tesla on I-80 outside Davenport was watching its remaining range drop one mile every forty seconds while the in-cabin display recommended a scenic detour through Galena.

At O’Hare, where roughly 2,400 passengers were sleeping under foil blankets in Terminal 3, traveler Pia Ostrowski said her Nest thermostat had pushed her a notification congratulating her on saving $0.43 by not being home, followed by a second notification asking if she’d like to enroll in a rebate program.

A Gen Z passenger near gate B12 told reporters she had stopped trusting weather apps in 2023 and now relied on “a girl from Marquette who posts vibes,” a system she described as “honestly more accurate, and she’ll tell you when to cry.”

An Indianapolis Department of Public Works supervisor, reached while attempting to back a plow out of a culvert his Google Maps had recommended as a four-minute shortcut, said he had stopped consulting the app in October and now navigated by looking out the window, a methodology he characterized as “making a comeback.”

At press time, the AccuStorm app had updated Hessler’s forecast to “Fair and 41°F,” which appeared to apply to his data’s representation in a server farm in northern Virginia rather than to Hessler, who was waist-deep in his driveway and could no longer feel his left hand.

The Tariffs Landed Thursday. The Olive Oil Did Not.

Margaret Thorne
-
0
The Tariffs Landed Thursday. The Olive Oil Did Not.

When did trade policy become something we announce the way other countries announce cabinet reshuffles — on a Thursday, before lunch, with the air of a man clearing his throat?

I was at Eliza’s on Tuesday. She had done the lamb again, because Eliza has decided the lamb is her contribution to civilization, and a small television in the kitchen was muted on a cable channel that runs the same chyron in three different fonts. Somewhere between the second pour and the cheese, the chyron changed. New tariff measures. Key trading partners. The phrase “key trading partners” doing the work it always does, which is none.

The bipartisan lobbyist was there. I will not name him because he has asked me not to and because, in his line of work, the not-naming is the service. He examined his cufflink the way he always examines his cufflink when an administration he privately advises has done something he will later be paid to explain. “It’s a posture,” he said, of the tariffs. He said it the way a priest says “it’s a mystery.”

I asked what we were tariffing this week. Someone at the end of the table said olive oil, with the certainty of a man who had just placed a large order. Someone else said semiconductors, which is what people in Georgetown say when they don’t know. My sister-in-law Judy, who works at the National Archives and therefore knows what a permanent record looks like, said nothing, and ate.

This is, I am told, the fourth round of new tariff measures this year. I am told this by a podcast my nephew recommends, hosted by two men who agree with each other for ninety minutes at a time. The hosts are confident the tariffs are working. They are also confident the tariffs are not really tariffs. They are, the hosts explain, leverage. Everything is leverage now. The grocery bill is leverage. The Christmas tree is leverage. The fact that Eliza’s olive oil order from Puglia has been “processing” for nineteen days is, I suppose, leverage too.

An economist I know — she runs a research desk at one of the big consultancies, the kind that issues a quarterly note nobody reads and a private memo everybody does — told me last month that the measures don’t really change the numbers. They change the headline. The numbers, she said, were already accounted for in November. The headline is for December. January will require its own headline. This is, she said, a calendar, not a policy.

What unsettled me at Eliza’s was not the announcement, which by Tuesday had not yet arrived but which everyone knew was arriving, the way one knows a relative is arriving from the airport. What unsettled me was the conversation that followed. Nobody at the table was for the tariffs. Nobody was against them. Everyone was, instead, “watching how it plays.” A senator’s wife, a former trade negotiator, two reporters, the lobbyist, a man from the Hill whose title I have never quite caught — and not one of them said the thing. Not one of them said: this is theater, and the audience is paying for the tickets at the register.

I said it. Eliza said, “Margaret, please.” The lobbyist examined the other cufflink. Judy passed the salt.

I am told this is what civic adulthood looks like now: the careful absence of opinion among people whose entire professional lives are built on having one. The tariffs will pass. The next round will be announced before the inauguration. The hosts of the podcast will explain it, and the economist will revise her numbers, and the lobbyist will buy a third cufflink, and somewhere in Puglia a man with an oil press will wonder, briefly, what he did.

The lamb, in the end, was excellent. We called it the lamb course, and we asked for the recipe.

Harvard Endowment Insists $2.2B Grant Freeze Hits a ‘Different Bucket’

Cody Thompson
-
0
Harvard Endowment Insists $2.2B Grant Freeze Hits a ‘Different Bucket’

CAMBRIDGE, MA — Harvard treasurer Margaret Voss spent Tuesday at her standing desk in Massachusetts Hall explaining, mostly to a printer, that the university’s $53.2 billion endowment and the $2.2 billion in federal grants frozen by the Trump administration are, in accounting terms, “two completely different buckets, almost philosophically.”

The position, articulated in a 14-page memo set in Garamond and stapled twice, holds that while Harvard does technically possess fifty-three billion dollars, that money is “structurally unavailable” to cover the federal grants, which fund things like biology lab freezers, postdoc stipends, and one centrifuge that nobody has been able to explain since 2011.

“The endowment is a long-term, professionally managed pool of restricted assets,” said Devon Carmichael, a higher-education finance consultant at Atlantic Heartland Group. “The grants are a short-term, federally restricted pool of restricted assets. The two are not interchangeable, except in the trivial sense that they are both money.”

Carmichael noted that the endowment returned 10.4% in fiscal 2025, a figure he described as “a strong year for a school that suddenly cannot afford anything.”

A separate document obtained Tuesday — a one-pager titled “FY26 Bridge Scenarios” — outlines the university’s options, which include drawing on a $400 million revolving credit facility, raising tuition by an unspecified amount, and a third option that has been redacted with what appears to be a Sharpie. The Sharpie did not fully take.

White House officials have indicated that the freeze will remain in place until Harvard complies with a list of demands that begins with “viewpoint diversity” and ends, nine pages later, with the phrase “and other items to be determined.” An aide confirmed Tuesday that the items remain to be determined.

Reached for comment, Harvard Management Company chief executive N.P. Narvekar said only that the endowment was “performing as designed” and that the firm had no plans to liquidate positions to backstop the freeze, citing an unrelated 1962 stipulation from the estate of one Atherton Beale that he said “really did tie our hands here.”

A first-year graduate student in molecular biology, who asked not to be named because her stipend is now technically a question, said she received an email Tuesday morning informing her that her March payment would be “honored on a best-efforts basis.” She was eating a Trader Joe’s burrito at the time, on a bench, in the rain.

The Atherton Beale fund, meanwhile, returned 11.1%.

Rate Cut Already Priced In, Fed to Spend Two Days Looking Pensive

Cody Thompson
-
0
Rate Cut Already Priced In, Fed to Spend Two Days Looking Pensive

WASHINGTON — The Federal Open Market Committee gaveled in Tuesday morning for a two-day meeting whose conclusion has been baked into Treasury futures since late September, prompting officials to clear their calendars and pretend to think.

The 25-basis-point cut, already reflected in the two-year, the dollar index, and an Etsy listing for a Jerome Powell prayer candle, will be formally announced Wednesday at 2 p.m. Eastern. The intervening 30 hours are reserved for staff presentations, a working lunch of room-temperature turkey wraps, and the ceremonial revision of dot plots.

“It’s important the Committee deliberate carefully and weigh incoming data,” said one senior Fed staffer, unwrapping a granola bar at a conference table where the decision had been sitting in a Google Doc since Friday. The doc’s edit history shows 14 changes, all to the word “appropriate.”

Markets remain unbothered. The CME FedWatch tool, which tracks rate-cut probabilities so traders don’t have to, showed a 96% chance of the cut as of Monday — a number that has not meaningfully moved since a mid-November Wall Street Journal piece widely interpreted as Nick Timiraos clearing his throat.

“We priced this in October 14th,” said Devra Kohl, a rates strategist at Beacon Macro who spent Tuesday morning trading a Bloomberg chat about whether the SEP would use the word ‘modestly’ or ‘moderately.’ “Anything Powell says tomorrow that isn’t ‘modestly’ is a 40-handle move in the long bond. Anything he says that IS ‘modestly’ is also a 40-handle move, just in the other direction. It’s a coin flip we already flipped.”

Inside the Eccles Building, the mood was described by one staffer as “calm, with light Sudoku.” A junior economist on the second floor was observed eating a Sweetgreen guacamole greens plate while paging through the Beige Book. The Beige Book, sources confirmed, is also already priced in.

President Trump, who has spent the past six weeks demanding a 100-basis-point cut on Truth Social and referring to the chair as “Too Late Jerome the Slow Walker,” reiterated his position Tuesday before pivoting to a post about a Caribbean cruise line he believes is being treated unfairly. Aides said the President will respond to whatever the Fed does by demanding it have done more of it, faster.

The Wednesday press conference is expected to last 47 minutes, of which 44 will be Powell saying “data-dependent” in slightly different orders. Reporters will ask whether the Committee sees a path to further cuts. Powell will say the Committee is monitoring developments. The S&P will close up 0.3%. The 10-year will close at exactly where it opened.

“This is the part of central banking they don’t put in the textbook,” Kohl said, watching her Bloomberg ticker do nothing. “Two days of meetings to ratify a Tuesday in October. The dot plot is performance art at this point. The performance is just that we’re still here.”

Apple’s New AI Summarizes Texts It Wrote, Sent, And Replied To On Your Behalf

Lena Wexler
-
0
Apple’s New AI Summarizes Texts It Wrote, Sent, And Replied To On Your Behalf

CUPERTINO, CA — At a closed developer briefing Monday morning, Apple unveiled a holiday slate of Apple Intelligence features that engineers described as a ‘fully end-to-end conversational stack,’ meaning the phone now drafts your message, sends it, receives the reply on your behalf, generates a response to that reply, and then surfaces a one-line summary so you know roughly what you said to your sister.

The headline feature, internally codenamed Lattice, will roll out to iOS 18.4 in time for what Apple’s marketing deck repeatedly called ‘the gifting window.’ Tim Cook, appearing remotely in a charcoal sweater, said the company’s goal was ‘to remove friction from the human moments that matter,’ a sentence the developer audience clapped at without visibly processing.

According to a presentation slide briefly visible behind a presenter, Lattice has been trained primarily on the user’s own outgoing messages from the past four years, meaning the AI’s voice converges asymptotically on a slightly more punctual version of the user, with fewer typos and a markedly improved relationship with em-dashes.

‘What we’re really seeing is the maturation of on-device inference,’ said Priya Halloran, a mobile-AI researcher at the Beacon Compute Group, who was not at the briefing but had read the embargoed press materials twice. ‘The interesting question is whether anyone in the loop is still a person. Apple’s position appears to be that it doesn’t matter, so long as the round trip stays under six seconds.’

Other announcements included a Photos feature that automatically generates captions describing what the user ‘probably felt’ during a given memory, a Mail tool that drafts replies based on emails the user has not yet opened, and a new Siri capability that quietly resolves disputes inside group chats by sending each participant a slightly different version of the same conciliatory paragraph.

Apple emphasized that all processing happens on-device, framing privacy as the central virtue of the rollout. The company did not address questions submitted in advance about the energy load of running a 3-billion-parameter model on every iPhone in North America simultaneously, except to note that the new A19 chip is ‘40% more efficient at the workloads we are about to invent reasons for it to do.’

A demo segment showed the assistant composing a holiday card to a user’s father, sending it, receiving the reply (‘Thanks bud’), generating a 142-word follow-up reflecting on the passage of time, and then condensing the entire exchange into a single notification reading ‘You and Dad caught up.’ The audience clapped again.

Pressed by one developer on whether the feature could be turned off, an Apple spokesperson said users would retain ‘meaningful choice’ over which surfaces Apple Intelligence appears on, and clarified that the toggle would live in a submenu under Accessibility, three taps deep, and would reset to on after each iOS update through approximately 2031.

Apple shares closed up 1.4 percent on the news. Asked at the briefing’s close whether the company worried that automating both ends of personal correspondence might, over time, produce a generation that has never actually written a sentence to a relative, an executive smiled and said the company was ‘really excited about what families will discover this holiday season.’

Nation Pauses to Honor Pearl Harbor, Resumes Caribbean Bombings by Lunch

Nash Grayson
-
0
Nation Pauses to Honor Pearl Harbor, Resumes Caribbean Bombings by Lunch

PEARL HARBOR, HI — Eighty-four years after a surprise attack drew the United States into a war it had spent two years actively avoiding, the nation gathered Sunday morning to honor the dead, lay a wreath at the USS Arizona Memorial, and then by 11:42 a.m. local time announce a fourth lethal strike on a small fishing vessel in international waters off Venezuela.

Surviving veterans, now in their late nineties, were wheeled into position by aides who carefully avoided mentioning that the Caribbean buildup currently underway has reached a force size larger than the one stationed in Hawaii on December 7, 1941.

President Trump did not attend in person, citing scheduling conflicts with what aides described as “watching the strike feed in a robe.” A pre-recorded video message played on a folding screen praised the Greatest Generation and pivoted, in the same sentence, to the importance of “stopping bad boats.”

“It is a sacred day,” said Brig. Gen. Margaret Holsey, addressing the crowd from a podium positioned so the camera angle did not include the destroyer visible behind her. “We honor the men who died defending a country that promised never to be caught off-guard again. Now if you’ll excuse me I have a 12:15.”

The ceremony’s official program included a 21-gun salute, a flyover by two F-22s, and a moment of silence that was broken six seconds in by the unmistakable sound of a Reaper drone confirming a successful kinetic engagement somewhere south of Curaçao.

Defense officials maintained the timing was coincidental. A Pentagon spokesperson, asked whether it sent the right message to mark a sneak-attack anniversary by simultaneously executing extrajudicial maritime strikes against vessels that posed no immediate threat, responded that the question was “framed unfairly” and “had a lot of words in it.”

Operation Southern Spear, now in its third week, has destroyed an estimated 14 boats, killed an as-yet-undisclosed number of people described in press releases as “narco-terrorists” and in court filings as “fishermen, possibly,” and produced exactly zero seized narcotics, because the boats were destroyed.

Veterans interviewed after the ceremony were largely diplomatic. “I was 19 when they hit us,” said Walter Ramsey, 103, of Bakersfield. “We didn’t know it was coming. I’m told the boats know it’s coming now. I’m told they get a couple seconds.” He paused. “That’s worse, somehow.”

A small group of administration officials laid a second wreath later in the afternoon at a separate site honoring the doctrine of avoiding undeclared wars, then quietly removed it before the cameras arrived.

Asked whether the Pearl Harbor anniversary had prompted any internal reflection on the difference between defending against a surprise attack and being the surprise attack, the National Security Council declined to comment, citing an active operation, an inactive conscience, and lunch.

1...131415...52Page 14 of 52